Electronic self-report assessment for cancer and self-care support: results of a multicenter randomized trial.

TitleElectronic self-report assessment for cancer and self-care support: results of a multicenter randomized trial.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsBerry DL, Hong F, Halpenny B, Partridge AH, Fann JR, Wolpin S, Lober WB, Bush NE, Parvathaneni U, Back AL, Amtmann D, Ford R
JournalJ Clin Oncol
Volume32
Issue3
Pagination199-205
Date Published2014 Jan 20
ISSN1527-7755
KeywordsAdaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Internet, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Patient Education as Topic, Patient-Centered Care, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Questionnaires, Self Care, Self Report, Treatment Outcome
Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effect of a Web-based, self-report assessment and educational intervention on symptom distress during cancer therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 752 ambulatory adult participants were randomly assigned to symptom/quality-of-life (SxQOL) screening at four time points (control) versus screening, targeted education, communication coaching, and the opportunity to track/graph SxQOL over time (intervention). A summary of the participant-reported data was delivered to clinicians at each time point in both groups. All participants used the assessment before a new therapeutic regimen, at 3 to 6 weeks and 6 to 8 weeks later, completing the final assessment at the end of therapy. Change in Symptom Distress Scale-15 (SDS-15) score from pretreatment to end of study was compared using analysis of covariance and regression analysis adjusting for selected variables.

RESULTS: We detected a significant difference between study groups in mean SDS-15 score change from baseline to end of study: 1.27 (standard deviation [SD], 6.7) in the control group (higher distress) versus -0.04 (SD, 5.8) in the intervention group (lower distress). SDS-15 score was reduced by an estimated 1.21 (95% CI, 0.23 to 2.20; P = .02) in the intervention group. Baseline SDS-15 score (P < .001) and clinical service (P = .01) were predictive. Multivariable analyses suggested an interaction between age and study group (P = .06); in subset analysis, the benefit of intervention was strongest in those age > 50 years (P = .002).

CONCLUSION: Web-based self-care support and communication coaching added to SxQOL screening reduced symptom distress in a multicenter sample of participants with various diagnoses during and after active cancer treatment. Participants age > 50 years, in particular, may have benefited from the intervention.

DOI10.1200/JCO.2013.48.6662
Alternate JournalJ. Clin. Oncol.
PubMed ID24344222