Pain intensity rating training: results from an exploratory study of the ACTTION PROTECCT system.

TitlePain intensity rating training: results from an exploratory study of the ACTTION PROTECCT system.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsSmith SM, Amtmann D, Askew RL, Gewandter JS, Hunsinger M, Jensen MP, McDermott MP, Patel KV, Williams M, Bacci ED, Burke LB, Chambers CT, Cooper SA, Cowan P, Desjardins P, Etropolski M, Farrar JT, Gilron I, Huang I-zu, Katz M, Kerns RD, Kopecky EA, Rappaport BA, Resnick M, Strand V, Vanhove GF, Veasley C, Versavel M, Wasan AD, Turk DC, Dworkin RH
JournalPain
Volume157
Issue5
Pagination1056-64
Date Published2016 May
ISSN1872-6623
KeywordsAged, Diabetic Neuropathies, Female, Humans, Inservice Training, Low Back Pain, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Pain Measurement, Reproducibility of Results, Statistics as Topic
Abstract

Clinical trial participants often require additional instruction to prevent idiosyncratic interpretations regarding completion of patient-reported outcomes. The Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION) public-private partnership developed a training system with specific, standardized guidance regarding daily average pain intensity ratings. A 3-week exploratory study among participants with low-back pain, osteoarthritis of the knee or hip, and painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy was conducted, randomly assigning participants to 1 of 3 groups: training with human pain assessment (T+); training with automated pain assessment (T); or no training with automated pain assessment (C). Although most measures of validity and reliability did not reveal significant differences between groups, some benefit was observed in discriminant validity, amount of missing data, and ranking order of least, worst, and average pain intensity ratings for participants in Group T+ compared with the other groups. Prediction of greater reliability in average pain intensity ratings in Group T+ compared with the other groups was not supported, which might indicate that training produces ratings that reflect the reality of temporal pain fluctuations. Results of this novel study suggest the need to test the training system in a prospective analgesic treatment trial.

DOI10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000502
Alternate JournalPain
PubMed ID27058680
Grant ListU01 FD005936 / FD / FDA HHS / United States